Performance Analysis of Littleton Manufacturing Essay -- Business Anal

feat Analysis of Littleton Manufacturing Littleton Manufacturing facilitates poor upward and downward communication throughout either levels of the organization. As a result of the ineffective communication system, Littleton faces a telephone number of issues which ultimately has affected the bottom line of the company. Key challenges to note argon low employee morale, low level of unity within the organization, poorly designed organisational structure and confusion in interpreting procedures and rules. Improving the trueness and speed of the flow of communication should be an important first touchstone in the resolution of the presented issues, thus allowing the organization to function more in effect and efficiently. The importance of organizations and their reasons for existence are outlined in Exhibit 1. Littleton before long is performing poorly across all of these factors, decreasing their importance and plowshare towards society. Littleton is categorized as a large-batch , mass production manufacturing system (Daft, 246). establish on this, Littleton should be, but arent carrying out properly, a mechanistic organizational structure with standardized gambols and formalized procedures to ensure efficiency (Daft, 248). Top focusing seems to be aware of this point, but they are not communicating the rationale and need for a mechanistic structure to the rest of the organization.Littletons twain units (fabrication and components) serve different domains and therefore have different performance and responsibility needs. Although these two units obviously require different structures, they are viewed and do by as one by management and employees, which causes communication barriers through inconsistencies in management style and rule implementation. All three symptoms of structural privation are present at Littleton. There is delay and lack of fibre in stopping point making. Information linkages in either the vertical or horizontal direction may be inadequate to ensure decision quality (Daft, 120). The organization does not respond innovatively to a changing environment, this is caused by the fact that departments are not coordinated horizontally (Daft, 120). Also, too oft conflict is evident. Organization structure has to specify a single identify of goals for the entire organization (Daft, 120).Littleton seems to have a lack of st... ...a are come on clarified in appendix 2.?61Enhance both upward and downward communication across all levels of the organization?61Improve management effectiveness?61 befriend improve employee morale?61Feasible in regards to live?61Be timely and enable Littleton to adapt to changes quickly.The chase alternatives were generated for Winslow to consider implementing1.Sell off either the Fabrications of Components part of Littleton.2.Redesign the organizational structure emphasizing an effective and efficient communication process.3.Initiate job rotation/cross training between departments.4.Co ntinue to function as it currently is.Exhibit 1 (Daft, 13)Organizations exist to do the following1. sire together resources to achieve desired goals and outcomes2.Produce goods and services efficiently3. drive on innovation4.Use modern manufacturing and information technologies5.Adapt to and influence a changing environment6.Create value for owners, customers, and employees7.Accommodate ongoing challenges of diversity, ethics, and the pauperization and coordination of employees