Thursday, March 28, 2019
Hamlets Hesitation as his Tragic Flaw in Hamlet by Shakespeare Essay
critical points Hesitation as his Tragic Flaw in critical point by ShakespeareIn the play crossroads, Hamlet is described as daring, brave, loyal, and intelligent. However, he is incessantly consumed by his own thoughts, this being his tragic flaw. There are numerous times Hamlet does not act when he should, like his softness to act on his fathers murder, his mothers marriage, and his uncles assuming of the throne. Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder, says the subtlety of Hamlet. The fact that his own uncle could kill his father leaves Hamlet dumbfounded and confused. Although Hamlet knows something is wrong in Denmark, he begins to question everything that the ghost has told him. When something is needed to be done, Hamlet is to busy thinking ab come break through of the closet his problems. An example of this is when Hamlet has his jab over the head of Claudius, and is prepared to murder him. He talks himself out of it. Instead, Hamlet writes a play in which the actors play out the like story that the ghost told Hamlet. This is when his tragic flaw, his hesitance to act, actu altogethery comes into play. His plan is to probe Claudiuss reaction to the play to determine his guilt. However, after Hamlet decides his uncle is guilty, he salve does nothing. This would experience been a great time to confront Claudius, but Hamlet seems more interested in taking credit for what he did rather of seeking revenge. By putting on that play Hamlet has softwood enough evidence to show Claudius was guilty, therefore he should demand carried out his revenge as concisely as possible, but again, his thoughts take over. This should have been the final piece of action for Hamlet to avenge his father?s death. Hamlet should have then stabbed Claudius the moment he knew he was guilty. This would... .... by and Hamlet was sure of his uncle?s guilt. This was the perfect time for Hamlet to brass section Claudius. The king was in a difficult state and c ould have been considerably dethroned. Unfortunately, Hamlet decides to speak to his mother instead, thus putting Hamlet in an emotional state of mind and giving Claudius time to re-think his options. Hamlet should have never allowed this for Claudius. He could have stopped all of the pain he caused himself if he would have just acted out his revenge as soon as he could. Although Hamlet seemed to be superior in all other characteristics, his one flaw cost him his life. Without doubt, it cost the lives of many others as well. If Hamlet could have taken immediate action, many deaths could have been avoided. Although Hamlet succeeds in his revenge, his procrastination proves to be his flaw in every sheath that took place.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.